Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile vs ATI Radeon HD 4250

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 4250 with RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

ATI HD 4250
2009
512 MB DDR2, 25 Watt
0.32
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
2024
4 GB GDDR6, 35 Watt
27.30
+8431%

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms ATI HD 4250 by a whopping 8431% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1311202
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.8853.47
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameRV620AD107
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date25 February 2009 (15 years ago)26 February 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores402048
Core clock speed594 MHz1485 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2025 MHz
Number of transistors181 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate2.376129.6
Floating-point processing power0.04752 TFLOPS8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs464
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed396 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.336 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI HD 4250 0.32
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 27.30
+8431%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

ATI HD 4250 227
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 66297
+29106%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−8400%
170−180
+8400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−8233%
250−260
+8233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−8400%
170−180
+8400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−8400%
170−180
+8400%
Hitman 3 4−5
−7400%
300−310
+7400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−8025%
650−700
+8025%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−7400%
300−310
+7400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−8293%
2350−2400
+8293%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−8233%
250−260
+8233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−8400%
170−180
+8400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−8400%
170−180
+8400%
Hitman 3 4−5
−7400%
300−310
+7400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−8025%
650−700
+8025%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−7400%
300−310
+7400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−8233%
750−800
+8233%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−8293%
2350−2400
+8293%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−8233%
250−260
+8233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−8400%
170−180
+8400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−8400%
170−180
+8400%
Hitman 3 4−5
−7400%
300−310
+7400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−8025%
650−700
+8025%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−7400%
300−310
+7400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−8233%
750−800
+8233%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−8293%
2350−2400
+8293%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Hitman 3 6−7
−8233%
500−550
+8233%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−8400%
170−180
+8400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−8400%
170−180
+8400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−8400%
85−90
+8400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−8400%
170−180
+8400%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.32 27.30
Recency 25 February 2009 26 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 35 Watt

ATI HD 4250 has 40% lower power consumption.

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 8431.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1000% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 4250 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 4250 is a desktop card while RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4250
Radeon HD 4250
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 83 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 18 votes

Rate RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.