Arc A530M vs ATI Radeon HD 4200
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 304 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 19.00 |
| Architecture | TeraScale (2005−2013) | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) |
| GPU code name | RS880 | DG2-256 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 August 2009 (15 years ago) | 1 August 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 40 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1300 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 181 million | 11,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 65 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 2.000 | 124.8 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.04 TFLOPS | 3.994 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 4 | 48 |
| TMUs | 4 | 96 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 192 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 12 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Width | IGP | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 1750 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 224.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.6 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.0 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 August 2009 | 1 August 2023 |
| Chip lithography | 55 nm | 6 nm |
Arc A530M has an age advantage of 14 years, and a 816.7% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 4200 and Arc A530M. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon HD 4200 is a desktop card while Arc A530M is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
