ATI Radeon 9000 PRO vs ATI HD 3850 X2

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking862not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.07no data
Power efficiency1.05no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameRV670RV250
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date4 April 2008 (16 years ago)1 July 2002 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$349 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320no data
Core clock speed669 MHz275 MHz
Number of transistors666 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate10.701.100
Floating-point processing power0.4282 TFLOPSno data
ROPs164
TMUs164

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 4x
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB64 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed828 MHz275 MHz
Memory bandwidth52.99 GB/s8.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)8.1
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.31.4
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 April 2008 1 July 2002
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 64 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 28 Watt

ATI HD 3850 X2 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 172.7% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9000 PRO, on the other hand, has 400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 3850 X2 and Radeon 9000 PRO. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2
Radeon HD 3850 X2
ATI Radeon 9000 PRO
Radeon 9000 PRO

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 6 votes

Rate Radeon HD 3850 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 13 votes

Rate Radeon 9000 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.