Quadro4 750 XGL vs ATI Radeon HD 3200

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1381not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Kelvin (2001−2003)
GPU code nameRS780NV25 A2
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date4 March 2008 (16 years ago)19 February 2002 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40no data
Core clock speed494 MHz275 MHz
Number of transistors180 million63 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm150 nm
Texture fill rate1.9762.200
Floating-point processing power0.03952 TFLOPSno data
ROPs48
TMUs48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16AGP 4x
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared128 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared225 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data7.2 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)8.1
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.31.3
OpenCL1.0N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 March 2008 19 February 2002
Chip lithography 65 nm 150 nm

ATI HD 3200 has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 130.8% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 3200 and Quadro4 750 XGL. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 3200 is a desktop card while Quadro4 750 XGL is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 3200
Radeon HD 3200
NVIDIA Quadro4 750 XGL
Quadro4 750 XGL

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 81 vote

Rate Radeon HD 3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro4 750 XGL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.