GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs ATI Radeon HD 3200

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 3200 and GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI HD 3200
2008
0.21

RTX 4070 SUPER outperforms ATI HD 3200 by a whopping 37138% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking13819
Place by popularitynot in top-10012
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data67.39
Power efficiencyno data24.37
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameRS780AD104
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date4 March 2008 (16 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores407168
Core clock speed494 MHz1980 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2475 MHz
Number of transistors180 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data220 Watt
Texture fill rate1.976554.4
Floating-point processing power0.03952 TFLOPS35.48 TFLOPS
ROPs480
TMUs4224
Tensor Coresno data224
Ray Tracing Coresno data56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6X
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared12 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1313 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data504.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.03.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI HD 3200 0.21
RTX 4070 SUPER 78.20
+37138%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 3200 82
RTX 4070 SUPER 30134
+36649%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD3
−7267%
221
+7267%
1440p-0−1139
4K-0−186

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.71
1440pno data4.31
4Kno data6.97

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−34900%
700−750
+34900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−5200%
150−160
+5200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−5900%
120−130
+5900%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−34900%
700−750
+34900%
Hitman 3 4−5
−3125%
120−130
+3125%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−3375%
270−280
+3375%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−8325%
300−350
+8325%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−450%
150−160
+450%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−5200%
150−160
+5200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−5900%
120−130
+5900%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−34900%
700−750
+34900%
Hitman 3 4−5
−3125%
120−130
+3125%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−3375%
270−280
+3375%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−10600%
428
+10600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−1800%
170−180
+1800%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−450%
150−160
+450%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−5200%
150−160
+5200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−5900%
120−130
+5900%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−34900%
700−750
+34900%
Hitman 3 4−5
−3125%
120−130
+3125%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−3375%
270−280
+3375%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−9425%
381
+9425%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−2133%
201
+2133%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−396%
139
+396%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Hitman 3 6−7
−1800%
110−120
+1800%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−10200%
200−210
+10200%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−6050%
120−130
+6050%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−6600%
65−70
+6600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 60−65

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−4400%
90−95
+4400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Battlefield 5 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Battlefield 5 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Metro Exodus 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 265
+0%
265
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 154
+0%
154
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Hitman 3 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 133
+0%
133
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 132
+0%
132
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 62
+0%
62
+0%

This is how ATI HD 3200 and RTX 4070 SUPER compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 SUPER is 7267% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 4070 SUPER is 10600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 SUPER is ahead in 25 tests (38%)
  • there's a draw in 40 tests (62%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.21 78.20
Recency 4 March 2008 8 January 2024
Chip lithography 65 nm 5 nm

RTX 4070 SUPER has a 37138.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 3200 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 3200
Radeon HD 3200
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 81 vote

Rate Radeon HD 3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 3960 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.