GMA X4700MHD vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking953not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.57no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Generation 5.0 (2008)
GPU code nameR600Montevina
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date12 December 2007 (16 years ago)1 October 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32080
Core clock speed600 MHz640 MHz
Number of transistors720 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology80 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate9.6006.400
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPS0.1024 TFLOPS
ROPs161
TMUs1610

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed800 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)10.0
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL3.32.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 December 2007 1 October 2008
Chip lithography 80 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 13 Watt

GMA X4700MHD has an age advantage of 9 months, a 23.1% more advanced lithography process, and 1438.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 2900 PRO and GMA X4700MHD. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 2900 PRO is a desktop card while GMA X4700MHD is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO
Radeon HD 2900 PRO
Intel GMA X4700MHD
GMA X4700MHD

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 16 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2900 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 4 votes

Rate GMA X4700MHD on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.