GeForce 9500 GS vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT

Place in the ranking	1153	1234
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	0.35	0.84
Architecture	TeraScale (2005−2013)	Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code name	R600	G96
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	6 November 2007 (17 years ago)	29 July 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	240	32
Core clock speed	601 MHz	550 MHz
Number of transistors	720 million	314 million
Manufacturing process technology	80 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	40 Watt
Texture fill rate	7.212	8.800
Floating-point processing power	0.2885 TFLOPS	0.088 TFLOPS
ROPs	12	8
TMUs	12	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 1.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	DDR2
Maximum RAM amount	256 MB	512 MB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	504 MHz
Memory bandwidth	51.2 GB/s	16.13 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	10.0 (10_0)	11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model	4.0	4.0
OpenGL	3.3	3.3
OpenCL	N/A	1.1
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	-	1.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI HD 2900 GT 0.76
+58.3%

9500 GS 0.48

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 2900 GT 292
+57.8%

9500 GS 185

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.76	0.48
Recency	6 November 2007	29 July 2008
Maximum RAM amount	256 MB	512 MB
Chip lithography	80 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	40 Watt

ATI HD 2900 GT has a 58.3% higher aggregate performance score.

9500 GS, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 23.1% more advanced lithography process, and 275% lower power consumption.

The Radeon HD 2900 GT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9500 GS in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.