GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1223not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.15no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameRV630AD103
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date28 June 2007 (17 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1209728
Core clock speed600 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1455 MHz
Number of transistors390 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate4.800442.3
Floating-point processing power0.144 TFLOPS28.31 TFLOPS
ROPs4112
TMUs8304
Tensor Coresno data304
Ray Tracing Coresno data76

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth16 GB/s448.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 June 2007 3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 80 Watt

ATI HD 2600 PRO has 128.6% lower power consumption.

RTX 4090 Max-Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 15 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1525% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 2600 PRO and GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 2600 PRO is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
Radeon HD 2600 PRO
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 238 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2600 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 128 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.