GMA X4500M vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1219not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.08no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Generation 5.0 (2008)
GPU code nameRV630Eaglelake
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date28 June 2007 (17 years ago)1 October 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12080
Core clock speed600 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors390 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology65 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate4.8004.000
Floating-point processing power0.144 TFLOPS0.064 TFLOPS
ROPs41
TMUs810

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth16 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)10.0
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL3.32.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 June 2007 1 October 2008
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 13 Watt

GMA X4500M has an age advantage of 1 year, and 169.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 2600 PRO and GMA X4500M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 2600 PRO is a desktop card while GMA X4500M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
Radeon HD 2600 PRO
Intel GMA X4500M
GMA X4500M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 240 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2600 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 10 votes

Rate GMA X4500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.