GeForce2 MX 400 PCI vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1340not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.57no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameRV630NV11 B2
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date28 June 2007 (17 years ago)3 March 2001 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores120no data
Core clock speed594 MHz200 MHz
Number of transistors390 million20 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Wattno data
Texture fill rate4.7520.8
Floating-point processing power0.1426 TFLOPSno data
ROPs42
TMUs84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCI
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2DDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB32 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed396 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.67 GB/s2.656 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)7.0
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.31.2
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 June 2007 3 March 2001
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 32 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 180 nm

ATI HD 2600 PRO AGP has an age advantage of 6 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 176.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP and GeForce2 MX 400 PCI. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP
Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP
NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 400 PCI
GeForce2 MX 400 PCI

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 11 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate GeForce2 MX 400 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.