PG506-232 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1318not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.08no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameRV610GA100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date19 February 2008 (16 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores403584
Core clock speed398 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1440 MHz
Number of transistors180 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt165 Watt
Texture fill rate1.592322.6
Floating-point processing power0.03184 TFLOPS10.32 TFLOPS
ROPs496
TMUs4224
Tensor Coresno data224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2HBM2
Maximum RAM amount256 MB24 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit3072 Bit
Memory clock speed495 MHz1215 MHz
Memory bandwidth7.92 GB/s933.1 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)N/A
Shader Model4.0N/A
OpenGL3.3N/A
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-8.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 February 2008 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 24 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 165 Watt

ATI HD 2400 has 725% lower power consumption.

PG506-232, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, a 9500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 2400 and PG506-232. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 2400 is a desktop card while PG506-232 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 2400
Radeon HD 2400
NVIDIA PG506-232
PG506-232

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 46 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate PG506-232 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.