GeForce MX450 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated454
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data26.93
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameRV610N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date28 June 2007 (17 years ago)1 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40896
Core clock speed525 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1575 MHz
Number of transistors180 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt25 Watt (12 - 29 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate2.100100.8
Floating-point processing power0.042 TFLOPS3.226 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs464

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 4.0 x4
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR5, GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz10000 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s64.03 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVINo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 June 2007 1 August 2020
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 25 Watt

ATI HD 2400 PRO PCI has 25% lower power consumption.

GeForce MX450, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 441.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI and GeForce MX450. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI is a desktop card while GeForce MX450 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI
Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI
NVIDIA GeForce MX450
GeForce MX450

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 7 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 1298 votes

Rate GeForce MX450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.