HD Graphics 12EU vs Radeon Graphics

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking892not rated
Place by popularity10not in top-100
Power efficiency9.17no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Generation 5.75 (2010)
GPU code nameRenoirIronlake
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)10 January 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores44896
Core clock speedno data533 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data177 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate42.006.396
Floating-point processing power1.344 TFLOPS0.1023 TFLOPS
ROPs82
TMUs2812

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPQPI
WidthIGPIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsMotherboard Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)10.1
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 7 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

Graphics has a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Graphics and HD Graphics 12EU. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Graphics
Radeon Graphics
Intel HD Graphics 12EU
HD Graphics 12EU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 6080 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 17 votes

Rate HD Graphics 12EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.