GeForce RTX 4080 Ti vs Radeon Graphics

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking899not rated
Place by popularity10not in top-100
Power efficiency9.06no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameRenoirAD102
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release dateno data2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores44814080
Core clock speedno data2340 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz2610 MHz
Number of transistorsno data76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt400 Watt
Texture fill rate42.001,148
Floating-point processing power1.344 TFLOPS73.5 TFLOPS
ROPs8144
TMUs28440
Tensor Coresno data440
Ray Tracing Coresno data110

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data336 mm
WidthIGP3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6X
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1325 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data678.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 400 Watt

Graphics has 2566.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 4080 Ti, on the other hand, has a 40% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Graphics and GeForce RTX 4080 Ti. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Graphics
Radeon Graphics
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti
GeForce RTX 4080 Ti

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 6363 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 679 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4080 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.