GeForce RTX 3090 vs Radeon Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Graphics and GeForce RTX 3090, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Graphics
15 Watt
1.99

RTX 3090 outperforms Graphics by a whopping 3391% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking90224
Place by popularity8not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data14.74
Power efficiency9.1313.66
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameRenoirGA102
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release dateno data1 September 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores44810496
Core clock speedno data1395 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz1695 MHz
Number of transistorsno data28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt350 Watt
Texture fill rate42.00556.0
Floating-point processing power1.344 TFLOPS35.58 TFLOPS
ROPs8112
TMUs28328
Tensor Coresno data328
Ray Tracing Coresno data82

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data336 mm
WidthIGP3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6X
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared24 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1219 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data936.2 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2
CUDA-8.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon Graphics 1.99
RTX 3090 69.47
+3391%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon Graphics 764
RTX 3090 26706
+3396%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD5−6
−3840%
197
+3840%
1440p3−4
−4167%
128
+4167%
4K2−3
−4250%
87
+4250%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data7.61
1440pno data11.71
4Kno data17.23

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 220
+0%
220
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 207
+0%
207
+0%
Elden Ring 238
+0%
238
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 102
+0%
102
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 188
+0%
188
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 151
+0%
151
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 505
+0%
505
+0%
Metro Exodus 169
+0%
169
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 130
+0%
130
+0%
Valorant 393
+0%
393
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 161
+0%
161
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 135
+0%
135
+0%
Dota 2 186
+0%
186
+0%
Elden Ring 297
+0%
297
+0%
Far Cry 5 147
+0%
147
+0%
Fortnite 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 402
+0%
402
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 171
+0%
171
+0%
Metro Exodus 150
+0%
150
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 132
+0%
132
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 222
+0%
222
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 95
+0%
95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 146
+0%
146
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 121
+0%
121
+0%
Dota 2 213
+0%
213
+0%
Far Cry 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 351
+0%
351
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Valorant 296
+0%
296
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 150
+0%
150
+0%
Elden Ring 189
+0%
189
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 150
+0%
150
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 92
+0%
92
+0%
World of Tanks 450−500
+0%
450−500
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 91
+0%
91
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 96
+0%
96
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 87
+0%
87
+0%
Far Cry 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 266
+0%
266
+0%
Metro Exodus 139
+0%
139
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 152
+0%
152
+0%
Valorant 295
+0%
295
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 59
+0%
59
+0%
Dota 2 182
+0%
182
+0%
Elden Ring 105
+0%
105
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 182
+0%
182
+0%
Metro Exodus 76
+0%
76
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 64
+0%
64
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 182
+0%
182
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 91
+0%
91
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45
+0%
45
+0%
Dota 2 202
+0%
202
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 159
+0%
159
+0%
Valorant 188
+0%
188
+0%

This is how Graphics and RTX 3090 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3090 is 3840% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3090 is 4167% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3090 is 4250% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.99 69.47
Chip lithography 7 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 350 Watt

Graphics has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 2233.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 3090, on the other hand, has a 3391% higher aggregate performance score.

The GeForce RTX 3090 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Graphics in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Graphics
Radeon Graphics
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
GeForce RTX 3090

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 6540 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.2 79268 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.