Tesla PG500-216 vs Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking659not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRDNA 2 (2022−2023)Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code nameRaphaelGV100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date26 September 2022 (2 years ago)26 November 2019 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1285120
Core clock speedno data1260 MHz
Boost clock speed2200 MHz1380 MHz
Number of transistorsno data21,100 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data250 Watt
Texture fill rateno data441.6
Floating-point processing powerno data14.13 TFLOPS
ROPsno data128
TMUsno data320
Tensor Coresno data640

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataHBM2
Maximum RAM amountno data32 GB
Memory bus widthno data4096 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1106 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1,133 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2
CUDA-7.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 September 2022 26 November 2019
Chip lithography 6 nm 12 nm

Graphics (Ryzen 7000) has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) and Tesla PG500-216. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is a notebook card while Tesla PG500-216 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
NVIDIA Tesla PG500-216
Tesla PG500-216

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 229 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Tesla PG500-216 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.