Quadro FX 1800M vs Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) with Quadro FX 1800M, including specs and performance data.

Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
2022
4.44
+267%

Graphics (Ryzen 7000) outperforms FX 1800M by a whopping 267% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6691055
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.85
ArchitectureRDNA 2 (2022−2023)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameRaphaelGT215
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date26 September 2022 (2 years ago)15 June 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12872
Core clock speedno data561 MHz
Boost clock speed2200 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data727 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data45 Watt
Texture fill rateno data13.46
Floating-point processing powerno data0.162 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Interfaceno dataMXM-A (3.0)

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data1 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data550 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data35.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_211.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Graphics (Ryzen 7000) 4.44
+267%
FX 1800M 1.21

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Graphics (Ryzen 7000) 11703
+239%
FX 1800M 3452

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD17
+325%
4−5
−325%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 17
+113%
8−9
−113%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Valorant 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Dota 2 14
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Far Cry 5 23
+130%
10−11
−130%
Fortnite 24−27
+420%
5−6
−420%
Forza Horizon 4 11
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+192%
12−14
−192%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%
Valorant 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
World of Tanks 70−75
+174%
27−30
−174%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Dota 2 37
+3600%
1−2
−3600%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%
Forza Horizon 4 9
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+192%
12−14
−192%
Valorant 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+329%
7−8
−329%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4 0−1
World of Tanks 30−35
+433%
6−7
−433%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7 0−1
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Valorant 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6 0−1
Fortnite 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 2−3 0−1
Valorant 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%

This is how Graphics (Ryzen 7000) and FX 1800M compete in popular games:

  • Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is 325% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is 3600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is ahead in 37 tests (90%)
  • there's a draw in 4 tests (10%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.44 1.21
Recency 26 September 2022 15 June 2009
Chip lithography 6 nm 40 nm

Graphics (Ryzen 7000) has a 266.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, and a 566.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 1800M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is a notebook graphics card while Quadro FX 1800M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
Quadro FX 1800M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 258 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 6 votes

Rate Quadro FX 1800M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.