Matrox Millennium G400 MAX vs Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking664not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRDNA 2 (2022−2023)G400 (1999−2002)
GPU code nameRaphaelToucan
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date26 September 2022 (2 years ago)20 May 1999 (25 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128no data
Core clock speedno data150 MHz
Boost clock speed2200 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data10 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm250 nm
Texture fill rateno data0.3
ROPsno data2
TMUsno data2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCI
Lengthno data150 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSDR
Maximum RAM amountno data32 MB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data200 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data3.2 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_26.0
OpenGLno dataNone
OpenCLno dataNone
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 September 2022 20 May 1999
Chip lithography 6 nm 250 nm

Graphics (Ryzen 7000) has an age advantage of 23 years, and a 4066.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) and Matrox Millennium G400 MAX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is a notebook card while Matrox Millennium G400 MAX is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Matrox Millennium G400 MAX
Millennium G400 MAX

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 234 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 4 votes

Rate Matrox Millennium G400 MAX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.