B200 SXM 192 GB vs Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Blackwell (2024)
GPU code nameLucienneGB100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date12 January 2021 (3 years ago)2024 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51216896
Core clock speed300 MHz1665 MHz
Boost clock speed1900 MHz1837 MHz
Number of transistors9,800 million208,000 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt1000 Watt
Texture fill rate60.80969.9
Floating-point processing power1.946 TFLOPS62.08 TFLOPS
ROPs824
TMUs32528
Tensor Coresno data528

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 5.0 x16
Widthno dataSXM Module

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM3e
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared96 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared4096 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data4.1 TB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)N/A
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA-9.0

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 1000 Watt

Graphics 512SP Mobile has 3900% lower power consumption.

B200 SXM 192 GB, on the other hand, has a 40% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile and B200 SXM 192 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile is a notebook card while B200 SXM 192 GB is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile
Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile
NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB
B200 SXM 192 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 39 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 31 vote

Rate B200 SXM 192 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.