GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps vs Radeon Graphics 448SP

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameRenoirTU117
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date6 January 2020 (4 years ago)25 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores448896
Core clock speed400 MHz1035 MHz
Boost clock speed1900 MHz1275 MHz
Number of transistors9,800 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt31 Watt
Texture fill rate53.2071.40
Floating-point processing power1.702 TFLOPS2.285 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs2856

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x4
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data64 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard DependentNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)6.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.31.2
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2020 25 August 2020
Chip lithography 7 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 31 Watt

Graphics 448SP has a 71.4% more advanced lithography process, and 106.7% lower power consumption.

MX450 30.5W 8Gbps, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Graphics 448SP and GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Graphics 448SP is a desktop card while GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Graphics 448SP
Radeon Graphics 448SP
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps
GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 66 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 448SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 10 votes

Rate GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.