RTX TITAN Ada Generation vs Radeon Graphics 448SP Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameBarceloAD102
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 January 2022 (2 years ago)2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores44818432
Core clock speed300 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1800 MHz2520 MHz
Number of transistors10,700 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt800 Watt
Texture fill rate50.401,452
Floating-point processing power1.613 TFLOPS92.9 TFLOPS
ROPs8192
TMUs28576

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data336 mm
Widthno dataQuad-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6X
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared48 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared24 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data1,152 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)6.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 800 Watt

Graphics 448SP Mobile has 1677.8% lower power consumption.

RTX TITAN Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 75% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Graphics 448SP Mobile and RTX TITAN Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Graphics 448SP Mobile is a notebook card while RTX TITAN Ada Generation is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Graphics 448SP Mobile
Radeon Graphics 448SP Mobile
NVIDIA RTX TITAN Ada Generation
RTX TITAN Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 29 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 448SP Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 20 votes

Rate RTX TITAN Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.