ATI FireGL V7700 vs Radeon E8950

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking370not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameAmethystRV670
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date29 September 2015 (8 years ago)19 November 2007 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$899

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048320
Core clock speed735 MHz777 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,000 million666 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)95 Wattno data
Texture fill rate128.012.43
Floating-point performance4.096 gflops0.4973 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data254 mm
WidthMXM Module2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR4
Maximum RAM amount8 GB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed6000 MHz2252 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s72.06 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.34.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 September 2015 19 November 2007
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm

Radeon E8950 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon E8950 and FireGL V7700. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon E8950 is a desktop card while FireGL V7700 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon E8950
Radeon E8950
ATI FireGL V7700
FireGL V7700

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 14 votes

Rate Radeon E8950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate FireGL V7700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.