Radeon PRO W6300 vs E8860

Place in the ranking	664	358
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	8.18	39.92
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	Venus	Navi 24
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	25 January 2014 (10 years ago)	19 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	768
Core clock speed	575 MHz	1512 MHz
Boost clock speed	625 MHz	2040 MHz
Number of transistors	1,500 million	5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	37 Watt	25 Watt
Texture fill rate	25.00	97.92
Floating-point processing power	0.8 TFLOPS	3.133 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32
TMUs	40	48
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x4
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	32 Bit
Memory clock speed	1125 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	72 GB/s	64 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

4x mini-DisplayPort

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon E8860 4.37

PRO W6300 14.41
+230%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon E8860 1686

PRO W6300 5559
+230%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	4.37	14.41
Recency	25 January 2014	19 January 2022
Chip lithography	28 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	37 Watt	25 Watt

PRO W6300 has a 229.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 48% lower power consumption.

The Radeon PRO W6300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon E8860 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon E8860 is a notebook card while Radeon PRO W6300 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.