GeForce4 448 Go vs Radeon E6465

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1201not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.67no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameCaicosNV18 A4
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date29 September 2015 (9 years ago)1 March 2002 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores160no data
Core clock speed600 MHz200 MHz
Number of transistors370 million29 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Wattno data
Texture fill rate4.8000.8
Floating-point processing power0.192 TFLOPSno data
ROPs42
TMUs84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 8x
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB64 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s6.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)8.0
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.41.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon E6465 231
+4520%
GeForce4 448 Go 5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 September 2015 1 March 2002
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 150 nm

Radeon E6465 has an age advantage of 13 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon E6465 and GeForce4 448 Go. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon E6465
Radeon E6465
NVIDIA GeForce4 448 Go
GeForce4 448 Go

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1 vote

Rate Radeon E6465 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce4 448 Go on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.