Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 vs ATI Radeon E4690

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1090not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.42no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameRV730Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 June 2009 (15 years ago)15 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32080
Core clock speed600 MHzno data
Number of transistors514 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Wattno data
Texture fill rate19.20no data
ROPs8no data
TMUs32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-IIno data
WidthMXM Moduleno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR4
Maximum RAM amount512 MBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1400 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1DirectX 12_1
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.3no data
OpenCL1.0no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2009 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 55 nm 10 nm

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 450% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon E4690 and Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon E4690 is a desktop card while Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon E4690
Radeon E4690
Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Radeon E4690 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 6 votes

Rate Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.