ATI Video Xpression vs ATI Radeon E2400

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Mach (1992−1997)
GPU code nameRV610Mach64
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date28 June 2007 (17 years ago)23 October 1995 (29 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$239

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40no data
Core clock speed600 MHz62 MHz
Number of transistors180 million1 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm600 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Wattno data
Texture fill rate2.400no data
Floating-point processing power0.048 TFLOPSno data
ROPs41
TMUs4no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-IIPCI
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3EDO
Maximum RAM amount128 MB1 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz62 MHz
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/s496.0 MB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)N/A
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.3N/A
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 June 2007 23 October 1995
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 1 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 600 nm

ATI E2400 has an age advantage of 11 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 823.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon E2400 and Video Xpression. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon E2400 is a notebook card while Video Xpression is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon E2400
Radeon E2400
ATI Video Xpression
Video Xpression

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon E2400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Video Xpression on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.