Tesla V100 SXM2 vs ATI Radeon 9800

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1423not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.28no data
ArchitectureRage 8 (2002−2007)Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code nameR350GV100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 March 2003 (21 year ago)21 June 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data5120
Core clock speed325 MHz1370 MHz
Number of transistors117 million21,100 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)37 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate2.600438.4
ROPs8128
TMUs8320

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 3.0 x16
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x MolexNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRHBM2
Maximum RAM amount128 MB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed290 MHz1758 MHz
Memory bandwidth18.56 GB/s900.1 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Videono data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)12.0
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A-
CUDA-7.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2003 21 June 2017
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 37 Watt 250 Watt

ATI 9800 has 575.7% lower power consumption.

Tesla V100 SXM2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 9800 and Tesla V100 SXM2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 9800 is a desktop card while Tesla V100 SXM2 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 9800
Radeon 9800
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2
Tesla V100 SXM2

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 10 votes

Rate Radeon 9800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 44 votes

Rate Tesla V100 SXM2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.