Radeon RX 550X vs ATI 9800

Place in the ranking	1423	589
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	0.28	8.09
Architecture	Rage 8 (2002−2007)	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code name	R350	Lexa
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	1 March 2003 (21 year ago)	16 December 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	no data	512
Core clock speed	325 MHz	1100 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1183 MHz
Number of transistors	117 million	2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	150 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	37 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	2.600	37.86
Floating-point processing power	no data	1.211 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	16
TMUs	8	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	AGP 8x	PCIe 3.0 x8
Length	no data	145 mm
Width	1-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x Molex	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	128 MB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	290 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	18.56 GB/s	96 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	9.0 (9_0)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	no data	6.4
OpenGL	2.0	4.6
OpenCL	N/A	2.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI 9800 0.15

RX 550X 5.90
+3833%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI 9800 57

RX 550X 2274
+3889%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.15	5.90
Recency	1 March 2003	16 December 2018
Maximum RAM amount	128 MB	4 GB
Chip lithography	150 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	37 Watt	50 Watt

ATI 9800 has 35.1% lower power consumption.

RX 550X, on the other hand, has a 3833.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 971.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 550X is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 9800 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.