RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile vs ATI Radeon 9800 PRO

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 9800 PRO with RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

ATI 9800 PRO
2003
128 MB DDR, 47 Watt
0.15

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms ATI 9800 PRO by a whopping 26393% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1417111
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.2223.90
ArchitectureRage 8 (2002−2007)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameR350no data
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date1 March 2003 (21 year ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data3072
Core clock speed380 MHzno data
Number of transistors117 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology150 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)47 Watt115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate3.040no data
ROPs8no data
TMUs8no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceAGP 8xno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x Molexno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 MB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed340 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth21.76 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Videono data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)12 Ultimate
OpenGL2.0no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI 9800 PRO 0.15
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 39.74
+26393%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI 9800 PRO 59
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 15287
+25810%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.15 39.74
Recency 1 March 2003 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 47 Watt 115 Watt

ATI 9800 PRO has 144.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 26393.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 20 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2900% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 9800 PRO in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 9800 PRO is a desktop card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 9800 PRO
Radeon 9800 PRO
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 59 votes

Rate Radeon 9800 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 19 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.