Tesla P100 DGXS vs ATI Radeon 9700

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1425not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.26no data
ArchitectureRage 8 (2002−2007)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameR300GP100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 July 2002 (22 years ago)5 April 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data3584
Core clock speed275 MHz1328 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1480 MHz
Number of transistors110 million15,300 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)37 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate2.200331.5
Floating-point processing powerno data10.61 TFLOPS
ROPs896
TMUs8224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 3.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsFloppyNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRHBM2
Maximum RAM amount128 MB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed270 MHz715 MHz
Memory bandwidth17.28 GB/s732.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-6.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2002 5 April 2016
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 37 Watt 300 Watt

ATI 9700 has 710.8% lower power consumption.

Tesla P100 DGXS, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 837.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 9700 and Tesla P100 DGXS. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 9700 is a desktop card while Tesla P100 DGXS is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 9700
Radeon 9700
NVIDIA Tesla P100 DGXS
Tesla P100 DGXS

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 11 votes

Rate Radeon 9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Tesla P100 DGXS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.