GeForce FX Go5200 vs ATI Radeon 9700

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1426not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.26no data
ArchitectureRage 8 (2002−2007)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameR300NV34 B1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 July 2002 (22 years ago)1 March 2003 (21 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed275 MHz200 MHz
Number of transistors110 million45 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)37 Wattno data
Texture fill rate2.2000.8
ROPs84
TMUs84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xAGP 8x
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsFloppyno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR
Maximum RAM amount128 MB32 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed270 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth17.28 GB/s6.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)9.0a
OpenGL2.01.5 (2.1)
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2002 1 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 32 MB

ATI 9700 has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

FX Go5200, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 9700 and GeForce FX Go5200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 9700 is a desktop card while GeForce FX Go5200 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 9700
Radeon 9700
NVIDIA GeForce FX Go5200
GeForce FX Go5200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 11 votes

Rate Radeon 9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate GeForce FX Go5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.