GeForce RTX 2070 vs ATI Radeon 9700 PRO

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 9700 PRO and GeForce RTX 2070, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI 9700 PRO
2002
128 MB DDR
0.14

RTX 2070 outperforms ATI 9700 PRO by a whopping 29864% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking142694
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data32.87
Power efficiencyno data16.54
ArchitectureRage 8 (2002−2007)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameR300TU106
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 July 2002 (22 years ago)17 October 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2304
Core clock speed325 MHz1410 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1620 MHz
Number of transistors110 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data175 Watt
Texture fill rate2.600233.3
Floating-point processing powerno data7.465 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs8144
Tensor Coresno data288
Ray Tracing Coresno data36

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsFloppy1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 MB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed310 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth19.84 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI 9700 PRO 0.14
RTX 2070 41.95
+29864%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI 9700 PRO 53
RTX 2070 16132
+30338%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD-0−1129
1440p-0−188
4K-0−162

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.87
1440pno data5.67
4Kno data8.05

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Elden Ring 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 90
+0%
90
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45
+0%
45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Metro Exodus 103
+0%
103
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110
+0%
110
+0%
Valorant 208
+0%
208
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 160
+0%
160
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 37
+0%
37
+0%
Dota 2 130
+0%
130
+0%
Elden Ring 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Far Cry 5 93
+0%
93
+0%
Fortnite 166
+0%
166
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 127
+0%
127
+0%
Metro Exodus 80
+0%
80
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 245
+0%
245
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65
+0%
65
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Valorant 125
+0%
125
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 79
+0%
79
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 32
+0%
32
+0%
Dota 2 130
+0%
130
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 132
+0%
132
+0%
Valorant 184
+0%
184
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Elden Ring 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 42
+0%
42
+0%
World of Tanks 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 76
+0%
76
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21
+0%
21
+0%
Far Cry 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Metro Exodus 82
+0%
82
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Valorant 127
+0%
127
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Dota 2 86
+0%
86
+0%
Elden Ring 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 86
+0%
86
+0%
Metro Exodus 32
+0%
32
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 128
+0%
128
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27
+0%
27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 86
+0%
86
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 48
+0%
48
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
+0%
10
+0%
Dota 2 116
+0%
116
+0%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Fortnite 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Valorant 68
+0%
68
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.14 41.95
Recency 1 July 2002 17 October 2018
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 12 nm

RTX 2070 has a 29864.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1150% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2070 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 9700 PRO in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 9700 PRO
Radeon 9700 PRO
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
GeForce RTX 2070

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 21 vote

Rate Radeon 9700 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 3664 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.