Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs ATI Radeon 9700 PRO X4

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 8 (2002−2007)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameR300GT200B
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 July 2002 (22 years ago)11 November 2008 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,799

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data192
Core clock speed325 MHz602 MHz
Number of transistors110 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data150 Watt
Texture fill rate2.60038.53
Floating-point processing powerno data0.4623 TFLOPS
ROPs824
TMUs864

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x Molex1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount128 MB1536 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed310 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth19.84 GB/s76.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DVI2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGL2.03.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2002 11 November 2008
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 1536 MB
Chip lithography 150 nm 55 nm

FX 4800 Mac Edition has an age advantage of 6 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 172.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 9700 PRO X4 and Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 9700 PRO X4 is a desktop card while Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 9700 PRO X4
Radeon 9700 PRO X4
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Radeon 9700 PRO X4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.