Radeon Pro WX 8100 vs ATI 9600

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1452not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.52no data
ArchitectureRage 8 (2002−2007)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameRV350Vega 10
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 October 2003 (21 year ago)3 December 2017 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data3584
Core clock speed324 MHz1200 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1500 MHz
Number of transistors60 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt230 Watt
Texture fill rate1.296336.0
Floating-point processing powerno data10.75 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs4224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRHBM2
Maximum RAM amount64 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed189 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.048 GB/s512.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video6x mini-DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.1.125

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2003 3 December 2017
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 230 Watt

ATI 9600 has 1816.7% lower power consumption.

Pro WX 8100, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 9600 and Radeon Pro WX 8100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 9600 is a desktop card while Radeon Pro WX 8100 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 9600
Radeon 9600
AMD Radeon Pro WX 8100
Radeon Pro WX 8100

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 128 votes

Rate Radeon 9600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon Pro WX 8100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.