Quadro T1200 Mobile vs ATI Radeon 9200 SE

Place in the ranking	1528	291
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	0.02	74.67
Architecture	Rage 7 (2001−2006)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	RV280	TU117
Market segment	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Release date	1 March 2003 (21 year ago)	12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	no data	1024
Core clock speed	200 MHz	855 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1425 MHz
Number of transistors	36 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	150 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	28 Watt	18 Watt
Texture fill rate	0.8	91.20
Floating-point processing power	no data	2.918 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	32
TMUs	4	64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	AGP 8x	PCIe 3.0 x16
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	64 MB	4 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	166 MHz	1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	2.656 GB/s	160.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	8.1	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	no data	6.6
OpenGL	1.4	4.6
OpenCL	N/A	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2
CUDA	-	7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	-0−1	58
1440p	-0−1	33
4K	-0−1	81

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

35−40

+0%

35−40

+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	17 +0%	17 +0%
Far Cry 5	65 +0%	65 +0%
Fortnite	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Valorant	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	14 +0%	14 +0%
Dota 2	114 +0%	114 +0%
Far Cry 5	59 +0%	59 +0%
Fortnite	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	71 +0%	71 +0%
Metro Exodus	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	71 +0%	71 +0%
Valorant	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
World of Tanks	220−230 +0%	220−230 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	11 +0%	11 +0%
Dota 2	107 +0%	107 +0%
Far Cry 5	56 +0%	56 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	37 +0%	37 +0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite

100−110

+0%

100−110

+0%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V	37 +0%	37 +0%
Metro Exodus	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Valorant	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	7 +0%	7 +0%
Far Cry 5	41 +0%	41 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite

50−55

+0%

50−55

+0%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Valorant	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Dota 2	109 +0%	109 +0%
Far Cry 5	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite

21−24

+0%

21−24

+0%

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 54 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.01	19.49
Recency	1 March 2003	12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount	64 MB	4 GB
Chip lithography	150 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	28 Watt	18 Watt

T1200 Mobile has a 194800% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 18 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 1150% more advanced lithography process, and 55.6% lower power consumption.

The Quadro T1200 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 9200 SE in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 9200 SE is a desktop card while Quadro T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.