P102-100 vs ATI Radeon 9200 LE

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameRV280GP102
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 May 2003 (21 year ago)12 February 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data3200
Core clock speed250 MHz1582 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1683 MHz
Number of transistors36 million11,800 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate1.000336.6
Floating-point processing powerno data10.77 TFLOPS
ROPs480
TMUs4200

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 3.0 x4
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x Molex2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5X
Maximum RAM amount64 MB5 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed200 MHz1376 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s440.3 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL1.44.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 2003 12 February 2018
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 5 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 250 Watt

ATI 9200 LE has 792.9% lower power consumption.

P102-100, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, a 7900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 837.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 9200 LE and P102-100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 9200 LE is a desktop card while P102-100 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 9200 LE
Radeon 9200 LE
NVIDIA P102-100
P102-100

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Radeon 9200 LE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 27 votes

Rate P102-100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.