GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB vs ATI Radeon 9000 PRO

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated98
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data15.64
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameRV250TU106
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 July 2002 (22 years ago)7 December 2021 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2176
Core clock speed275 MHz1470 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1650 MHz
Number of transistors36 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt184 Watt
Texture fill rate1.100224.4
Floating-point processing powerno data7.181 TFLOPS
ROPs448
TMUs4136
Tensor Coresno data272
Ray Tracing Coresno data34

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount64 MB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed275 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth8.8 GB/s336.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGL1.44.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2002 7 December 2021
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 184 Watt

ATI 9000 PRO has 557.1% lower power consumption.

RTX 2060 12 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 19 years, a 19100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 9000 PRO and GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 9000 PRO
Radeon 9000 PRO
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB
GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 13 votes

Rate Radeon 9000 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 1077 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.