Radeon Pro 5700 vs ATI 8500

Place in the ranking	1496	180
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	0.06	16.21
Architecture	Rage 7 (2001−2006)	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code name	R200	Navi 10
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	14 August 2001 (23 years ago)	4 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	no data	2304
Core clock speed	275 MHz	1243 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1350 MHz
Number of transistors	60 million	10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	150 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	23 Watt	130 Watt
Texture fill rate	2.200	194.4
Floating-point processing power	no data	6.221 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	64
TMUs	8	144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	AGP 4x	PCIe 4.0 x16
Width	1-slot	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	64 MB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	275 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	8.8 GB/s	384.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	8.1	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	no data	6.5
OpenGL	1.4	4.6
OpenCL	N/A	2.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI 8500 0.02

Pro 5700 30.73
+153550%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI 8500 6

Pro 5700 11844
+197300%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.02	30.73
Recency	14 August 2001	4 August 2020
Maximum RAM amount	64 MB	8 GB
Chip lithography	150 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	23 Watt	130 Watt

ATI 8500 has 465.2% lower power consumption.

Pro 5700, on the other hand, has a 153550% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 18 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2042.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro 5700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 8500 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 8500 is a desktop card while Radeon Pro 5700 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.