Quadro P5000 Max-Q vs ATI Radeon 8500

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1492not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.06no data
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameR200N17E-Q5 Max-Q
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date14 August 2001 (23 years ago)11 January 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2048
Core clock speed275 MHz1101 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1366 MHz
Number of transistors60 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology150 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate2.200no data
ROPs4no data
TMUs8no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceAGP 4xno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount64 MB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed275 MHz6006 MHz
Memory bandwidth8.8 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Videono data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112_1
OpenGL1.4no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 August 2001 11 January 2017
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 100 Watt

ATI 8500 has 334.8% lower power consumption.

P5000 Max-Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 15 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 837.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 8500 and Quadro P5000 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 8500 is a desktop card while Quadro P5000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 8500
Radeon 8500
NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Max-Q
Quadro P5000 Max-Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 94 votes

Rate Radeon 8500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 10 votes

Rate Quadro P5000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.