Radeon RX 560X vs ATI 8500 XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated497
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data7.96
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameR250Polaris 21
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 June 2002 (22 years ago)11 April 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1024
Core clock speed300 MHz1175 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1275 MHz
Number of transistors60 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate2.40081.60
Floating-point processing powerno data2.611 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs864

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 3.0 x8
Lengthno data170 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount128 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed300 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth9.6 GB/s112.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL1.44.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2002 11 April 2018
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 75 Watt

ATI 8500 XT has 200% lower power consumption.

RX 560X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 15 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 971.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 8500 XT and Radeon RX 560X. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 8500 XT
Radeon 8500 XT
AMD Radeon RX 560X
Radeon RX 560X

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 8500 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 398 votes

Rate Radeon RX 560X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.