Radeon RX 550X Mobile vs ATI 8500 X4

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated581
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data8.45
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameR200Polaris 23
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)11 April 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data640
Core clock speed250 MHz1100 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1287 MHz
Number of transistors60 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)92 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate2.00051.48
Floating-point processing powerno data1.647 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs840

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCI-XPCIe 3.0 x8
Length330 mmno data
Width1-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount64 MB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed250 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth4 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVINo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 92 Watt 50 Watt

RX 550X Mobile has a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 971.4% more advanced lithography process, and 84% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 8500 X4 and Radeon RX 550X Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 8500 X4 is a desktop card while Radeon RX 550X Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 8500 X4
Radeon 8500 X4
AMD Radeon RX 550X Mobile
Radeon RX 550X Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Radeon 8500 X4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 37 votes

Rate Radeon RX 550X Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.