ATI Radeon X1300 CE vs 780M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking298not rated
Place by popularity47not in top-100
Power efficiency85.03no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)Ultra-Threaded SE (2005−2007)
GPU code nameHawx PointRV505
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 December 2023 (less than a year ago)27 October 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768no data
Core clock speed800 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed2700 MHzno data
Number of transistors25,390 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt27 Watt
Texture fill rate129.61.400
Floating-point processing power8.294 TFLOPSno data
ROPs324
TMUs484
Ray Tracing Cores12no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared128 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.83.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL2.1N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 December 2023 27 October 2006
Chip lithography 4 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 27 Watt

Radeon 780M has an age advantage of 17 years, a 2150% more advanced lithography process, and 80% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 780M and Radeon X1300 CE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 780M is a notebook card while Radeon X1300 CE is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 780M
Radeon 780M
ATI Radeon X1300 CE
Radeon X1300 CE

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1491 vote

Rate Radeon 780M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon X1300 CE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.