Radeon PRO W7900 vs 760M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 760M with Radeon PRO W7900, including specs and performance data.

Radeon 760M
2023
15 Watt
14.95

PRO W7900 outperforms 760M by a whopping 411% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking35212
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data16.63
Power efficiency68.8917.89
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code namePhoenixNavi 31
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date6 December 2023 (less than a year ago)13 April 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5126144
Core clock speed800 MHz1855 MHz
Boost clock speed2599 MHz2495 MHz
Number of transistors25,390 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt295 Watt
Texture fill rate83.17958.1
Floating-point processing power5.323 TFLOPS61.32 TFLOPS
ROPs16192
TMUs32384
Ray Tracing Cores896

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data280 mm
Widthno data3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared48 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data864.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.2
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon 760M 14.95
PRO W7900 76.35
+411%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 760M 5768
PRO W7900 29456
+411%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD32
−400%
160−170
+400%
1440p23
−378%
110−120
+378%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data24.99
1440pno data36.35

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30
−400%
150−160
+400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−386%
170−180
+386%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−380%
120−130
+380%
Battlefield 5 50−55
−400%
250−260
+400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
−384%
150−160
+384%
Cyberpunk 2077 24
−400%
120−130
+400%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−400%
180−190
+400%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
−400%
210−220
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
−405%
500−550
+405%
Hitman 3 27−30
−383%
140−150
+383%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
−355%
350−400
+355%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−400%
260−270
+400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−400%
210−220
+400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
−400%
250−260
+400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
−406%
400−450
+406%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−386%
170−180
+386%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−380%
120−130
+380%
Battlefield 5 50−55
−400%
250−260
+400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
−384%
150−160
+384%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
−400%
90−95
+400%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−400%
180−190
+400%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
−400%
210−220
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
−405%
500−550
+405%
Hitman 3 27−30
−383%
140−150
+383%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
−355%
350−400
+355%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−400%
260−270
+400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−400%
210−220
+400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 44
−400%
220−230
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−400%
180−190
+400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
−406%
400−450
+406%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−386%
170−180
+386%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−380%
120−130
+380%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
−384%
150−160
+384%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−400%
120−130
+400%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−400%
180−190
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
−405%
500−550
+405%
Hitman 3 27−30
−383%
140−150
+383%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
−355%
350−400
+355%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 37
−386%
180−190
+386%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 23
−378%
110−120
+378%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
−406%
400−450
+406%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−400%
210−220
+400%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−383%
140−150
+383%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
−378%
110−120
+378%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−400%
75−80
+400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−400%
60−65
+400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
−400%
80−85
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−400%
90−95
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−400%
400−450
+400%
Hitman 3 18−20
−400%
90−95
+400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−384%
150−160
+384%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−381%
130−140
+381%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
−400%
140−150
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−400%
80−85
+400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
−384%
450−500
+384%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−380%
120−130
+380%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−400%
75−80
+400%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
−400%
55−60
+400%
Hitman 3 10−12
−400%
55−60
+400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
−361%
350−400
+361%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−400%
75−80
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−400%
70−75
+400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−400%
45−50
+400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−400%
100−105
+400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−400%
75−80
+400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−400%
70−75
+400%

This is how Radeon 760M and PRO W7900 compete in popular games:

  • PRO W7900 is 400% faster in 1080p
  • PRO W7900 is 378% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.95 76.35
Recency 6 December 2023 13 April 2023
Chip lithography 4 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 295 Watt

Radeon 760M has an age advantage of 7 months, a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 1866.7% lower power consumption.

PRO W7900, on the other hand, has a 410.7% higher aggregate performance score.

The Radeon PRO W7900 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 760M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 760M is a notebook card while Radeon PRO W7900 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 760M
Radeon 760M
AMD Radeon PRO W7900
Radeon PRO W7900

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 171 vote

Rate Radeon 760M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 73 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.