Jetson TK1 vs Radeon 760M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking352not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency69.33no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code nameHawx PointGK20A
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date6 December 2023 (less than a year ago)15 October 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512192
Core clock speed800 MHz756 MHz
Boost clock speed2599 MHz951 MHz
Number of transistors25,390 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology4 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt8 Watt
Texture fill rate83.177.608
Floating-point processing power5.323 TFLOPS0.3652 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs328
Ray Tracing Cores8no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 1.0 x1
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR3L
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared467 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data7.472 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.86.5 (5.1)
OpenGL4.6ES 3.1
OpenCL2.1N/A
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-3.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 December 2023 15 October 2014
Chip lithography 4 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 8 Watt

Radeon 760M has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.

Jetson TK1, on the other hand, has 87.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 760M and Jetson TK1. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 760M
Radeon 760M
NVIDIA Jetson TK1
Jetson TK1

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 174 votes

Rate Radeon 760M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Jetson TK1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.