H200 NVL vs Radeon 760M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking353not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency68.59no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)Hopper (2022−2024)
GPU code nameHawx PointGH100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date6 December 2023 (1 year ago)18 November 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51216896
Core clock speed800 MHz1365 MHz
Boost clock speed2599 MHz1785 MHz
Number of transistors25,390 million80,000 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rate83.17942.5
Floating-point processing power5.323 TFLOPS60.32 TFLOPS
ROPs1624
TMUs32528
Tensor Coresno data528
Ray Tracing Cores8no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM3e
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared141 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared5120 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1313 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data3.36 TB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)N/A
Shader Model6.8N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA-9.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 December 2023 18 November 2024
Chip lithography 4 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 600 Watt

Radeon 760M has a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 3900% lower power consumption.

H200 NVL, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 760M and H200 NVL. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 760M is a notebook card while H200 NVL is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 760M
Radeon 760M
NVIDIA H200 NVL
H200 NVL

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 206 votes

Rate Radeon 760M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate H200 NVL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.