Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs ATI 7200

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated144
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data25.34
Power efficiencyno data10.63
ArchitectureRage 6 (2000−2007)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameR100Vega 10
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 April 2000 (24 years ago)13 August 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data3584
Core clock speed166 MHz1200 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1500 MHz
Number of transistors30 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt230 Watt
Texture fill rate1336.0
Floating-point processing powerno data10.75 TFLOPS
ROPs264
TMUs6224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRHBM2
Maximum RAM amount32 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed166 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth5.312 GB/s512.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA4x mini-DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.1.125

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI 7200 2
Pro WX 8200 13526
+676200%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2000 13 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 180 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 230 Watt

ATI 7200 has 900% lower power consumption.

Pro WX 8200, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 18 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 7200 and Radeon Pro WX 8200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 7200 is a desktop card while Radeon Pro WX 8200 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 7200
Radeon 7200
AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
Radeon Pro WX 8200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 15 votes

Rate Radeon 7200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 27 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 8200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.