Quadro P4200 vs ATI Radeon 7200 64 MB

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated209
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data17.40
ArchitectureRage 6 (2000−2007)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameR100GP104
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date1 April 2000 (24 years ago)21 February 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2304
Core clock speed166 MHz1227 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1647 MHz
Number of transistors30 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate1237.2
Floating-point processing powerno data7.589 TFLOPS
ROPs264
TMUs6144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceAGP 4xMXM-B (3.0)
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount64 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed166 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth5.312 GB/s192.3 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2000 21 February 2018
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 180 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 100 Watt

ATI 7200 64 MB has 334.8% lower power consumption.

Quadro P4200, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 17 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1025% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 7200 64 MB and Quadro P4200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 7200 64 MB is a desktop card while Quadro P4200 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 7200 64 MB
Radeon 7200 64 MB
NVIDIA Quadro P4200
Quadro P4200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Radeon 7200 64 MB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 57 votes

Rate Quadro P4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.