GeForce 210 OEM vs ATI Radeon 7200 64 MB

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 6 (2000−2007)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameR100GT216
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 April 2000 (24 years ago)4 September 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data16
Core clock speed166 MHz475 MHz
Number of transistors30 million486 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt31 Watt
Texture fill rate13.800
Floating-point performanceno data0.0352 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR2
Maximum RAM amount64 MB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed332 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth5.312 GB/s6.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.011.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGL1.33.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2000 4 September 2009
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 180 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 31 Watt

ATI 7200 64 MB has 34.8% lower power consumption.

210 OEM, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 7200 64 MB and GeForce 210 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 7200 64 MB
Radeon 7200 64 MB
NVIDIA GeForce 210 OEM
GeForce 210 OEM

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Radeon 7200 64 MB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 78 votes

Rate GeForce 210 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.