Radeon PRO V710 vs 680M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking336not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.09no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameRembrandt+Navi 32
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date3 January 2023 (1 year ago)3 October 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7683456
Core clock speed2000 MHz1900 MHz
Boost clock speed2200 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistors13,100 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt158 Watt
Texture fill rate105.6432.0
Floating-point processing power3.379 TFLOPS27.65 TFLOPS
ROPs3296
TMUs48216
Ray Tracing Cores1254

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared28 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared224 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data504.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 January 2023 3 October 2024
Chip lithography 6 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 158 Watt

Radeon 680M has 216% lower power consumption.

PRO V710, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 680M and Radeon PRO V710. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 680M is a desktop card while Radeon PRO V710 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 680M
Radeon 680M
AMD Radeon PRO V710
Radeon PRO V710

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 929 votes

Rate Radeon 680M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon PRO V710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.