GeForce RTX 4090 D vs Radeon 660M

Place in the ranking	561	13
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	13.85
Power efficiency	11.86	12.09
Architecture	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Rembrandt+	AD102
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	3 January 2023 (2 years ago)	28 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$1,599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	14592
Core clock speed	1500 MHz	2280 MHz
Boost clock speed	1900 MHz	2520 MHz
Number of transistors	13,100 million	76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	425 Watt
Texture fill rate	45.60	1,149
Floating-point processing power	1.459 TFLOPS	73.54 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	176
TMUs	24	456
Tensor Cores	no data	456
Ray Tracing Cores	6	114

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	304 mm
Width	no data	3-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	24 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	1,008 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Portable Device Dependent	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.7	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	-	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon 660M 6.89

RTX 4090 D 74.62
+983%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 660M 2647

RTX 4090 D 28686
+984%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−942%

250−260
+942%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

no data

6.40

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −967%	160−170 +967%
Cyberpunk 2077	24 −942%	250−260 +942%
Elden Ring	22 −945%	230−240 +945%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −945%	230−240 +945%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −967%	160−170 +967%
Cyberpunk 2077	10 −900%	100−105 +900%
Forza Horizon 4	42 −971%	450−500 +971%
Metro Exodus	32 −838%	300−310 +838%
Red Dead Redemption 2	20−22 −950%	210−220 +950%
Valorant	36 −872%	350−400 +872%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −945%	230−240 +945%
Counter-Strike 2	11 −900%	110−120 +900%
Cyberpunk 2077	7 −971%	75−80 +971%
Dota 2	35 −900%	350−400 +900%
Elden Ring	22 −945%	230−240 +945%
Far Cry 5	29 −934%	300−310 +934%
Fortnite	40−45 −876%	400−450 +876%
Forza Horizon 4	33 −961%	350−400 +961%
Grand Theft Auto V	25 −980%	270−280 +980%
Metro Exodus	20 −950%	210−220 +950%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	55−60 −971%	600−650 +971%
Red Dead Redemption 2	20−22 −950%	210−220 +950%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −948%	220−230 +948%
Valorant	19 −953%	200−210 +953%
World of Tanks	100−110 −975%	1150−1200 +975%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −945%	230−240 +945%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −967%	160−170 +967%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −971%	150−160 +971%
Dota 2	48 −942%	500−550 +942%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −868%	300−310 +868%
Forza Horizon 4	28 −971%	300−310 +971%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	55−60 −971%	600−650 +971%
Valorant	21−24 −945%	230−240 +945%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	7−8 −971%	75−80 +971%
Elden Ring	9−10 −956%	95−100 +956%
Grand Theft Auto V	7−8 −971%	75−80 +971%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −953%	400−450 +953%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −900%	50−55 +900%
World of Tanks	50−55 −900%	500−550 +900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −900%	120−130 +900%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −900%	100−105 +900%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −900%	50−55 +900%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −971%	150−160 +971%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −977%	140−150 +977%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −900%	100−105 +900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 −963%	85−90 +963%
Valorant	18−20 −956%	190−200 +956%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
Dota 2	18−20 −956%	190−200 +956%
Elden Ring	4−5 −900%	40−45 +900%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 −959%	180−190 +959%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −950%	21−24 +950%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	20−22 −950%	210−220 +950%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −900%	40−45 +900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −959%	180−190 +959%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 −900%	60−65 +900%
Counter-Strike 2	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −950%	21−24 +950%
Dota 2	18−20 −956%	190−200 +956%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −963%	85−90 +963%
Fortnite	6−7 −900%	60−65 +900%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −971%	75−80 +971%
Valorant	6−7 −900%	60−65 +900%

This is how Radeon 660M and RTX 4090 D compete in popular games:

RTX 4090 D is 942% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	6.89	74.62
Recency	3 January 2023	28 December 2023
Chip lithography	6 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	425 Watt

Radeon 660M has 962.5% lower power consumption.

RTX 4090 D, on the other hand, has a 983% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 months, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4090 D is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 660M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 660M is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 4090 D is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.